Represented a prominent chemical manufacturer in a multi-jurisdictional dispute over lithium-ion battery technology used in electric vehicles. Representing the client at the ITC, Fish was able to avoid inter partes review (IPR) institution against all of its offensively asserted patents, while successfully having an IPR instituted against a defensive patent. Ultimately, the parties reached a global, worldwide settlement of $1.8 billion and a joint agreement not to sue each other for ten years.
Defended a Fortune 100 electronics company in an ITC dispute involving a line of smart televisions and alleged infringement related to video processing devices. The case settled a week before trial after the opposing party faced adverse decisions related to the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement and an evidentiary issue.