Headshot of Jason Wolff

Jason W. Wolff

Title
Principal
Offices
San Diego
Phone Numbers
  • 858-678-4719
    • Email
    [email protected]

    Overview

    Jason W. Wolff’s practice emphasizes intellectual property litigation and dispute resolution involving electrical engineering and computer science-related innovations. He has broad experience in controls, communication protocols, computer algorithms, and database systems.

    Jason has represented clients in complex, multiparty IP disputes in U.S. District Courts throughout California and in Delaware, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. He has also successfully represented clients in post-grant proceedings.

    He asserts and defends his clients’ IP rights in and out of court. His cases have involved wide-ranging technologies, including databases, client-servers, network protocols, wireless telecommunications, computer imaging, and electronics.

    Previously, Jason worked in the patent group at Oracle Corp. and for another national IP law firm, including in that firm’s Munich office handling European-related patent matters.

    Before practicing law, Jason was a product design engineer. In that role, he designed embedded controllers, DDCs, and software for network-based client-server applications. His experience also includes client-server and relational database design, and developing software for asset management, financial applications, high-speed printer controllers, commercial/industrial controls, and thermal ampacity modeling for high-voltage power transmission. Jason is also familiar with most internet/network standards and RFCs, as well as many programming languages and wireless telecommunications standards.

    Experience

    InfoGation Corp. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. et al. (S.D. Cal.): Patent case involving navigation technology

    Kaufman v. Microsoft Corporation (S.D.N.Y.): Patent case relating to automatically creating user interfaces for a database

    Tangelo IP, LLC v. Dollar General Corporation and Flipp Corporation (E.D. Tex.): Patent case involving electronic catalogs

    Collaborative Agreements LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al. (W.D. Tex. and N.D. Cal.): Patent case involving digital signature technology

    Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation (D. Del.): Multi-patent case related to dynamic load balancing

    Walker Digital, LLC v. Microsoft et al. (D. Del.): Several patent cases involving mapping, database, gaming, and advertising technology

    Cary A. Jardin v. DATAllegro, Inc. et al. (S.D. Cal.): Patent inventorship case involving distributed database technology

    Eolas Technologies LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al. (E.D. Tex.): Multi-patent case involving web browser and application technology

    Cary A. Jardin v. DATAllegro, Inc. et al. (S.D. Cal.): Patent case involving distributed database query join technology

    Northeastern University and Jarg Corporation v. Google Inc. (E.D. Tex.): Patent case involving distributing database query routing technology

    Function Media LLC v. Google Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.): Multi-patent case involving online advertising technology; four parallel inter partes reexaminations

    Screentone Systems Corporation v. Cannon USA Inc. et al. (C.D. Cal.): Patent case involving digital halftone technology

    Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Acacia Research Corporation et al. (N.D. Cal.): Patent case involving digital halftone technology

    Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Red Hat, Inc. and VMware, Inc. (N.D. Cal.): Multi-patent case involving dynamic content creation technology for webservers

    Implicit Networks, Inc. v. Adobe Systems Incorporation et al. (W.D. Wash. and N.D. Cal.): Multi-patent case involving dynamic content creation technology for webservers

    Software Rights Archive LLC v. Google Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex. and N.D. Cal.): Multi-patent case involving database information retrieval and ranking technology; three parallel ex parte reexaminations

    HyperPhrase Technologies LLC et al. v. Google Inc. (W.D. Wis.): Multi-patent case involving database and automatic hyperlink creation technology

    NetJumper Software LLC v. Google Inc. (D. Mich.): Multi-patent case involving web browser and plug-in technology; one parallel ex parte reexamination

    Lucent Technologies Inc. v. Gateway Inc. et al. (S.D. Cal.): Multi-patent cases involving speech and audio codecs

    Immersion Corporation v. Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation (N.D. Cal.): Multi-patent case involving haptic technology for computer gaming

    Fred B. DuFresne v. Microsoft Corporation and Adobe Systems Incorporated et al. (D. Mass.): Patent case involving dynamic content creation technology for webservers