Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. v. C T E Global, Inc., 1:11-cv-04276 (N.D. Ill. 2012). Obtained consent judgment and permanent injunction against U.S. importer of glucoamylase industrial enzymes (used in the manufacture of fuel ethanol) that infringed client’s U.S. patents.
Layne Christensen v. The Purolite Company (D. Kan. 2012): Represented ion exchange resin manufacturer in litigation involving allegations of patent infringement and breach of contract concerning ion exchange resins for removal of arsenates from water.
Novozymes A/S v. Genencor International, Inc. and Enzyme Development Corp., 446 F. Supp. 2d 297 (D. Del. 2006), 474 F. Supp. 2d 592 (2007);
Danisco A/S v. Novo Nordisk A/S, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1842 (S.D.N.Y.);
Novo Nordisk v. Eli Lilly & Co., 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18690 (D. Del.);
Fromson v. Anitec Printing Plates, 39 USPQ2D 1727 (D. Mass. 1996) Affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, 132 F.3d 1437 (Fed. Cir. 1997); cert. denied 1998 U.S. LEXIS 4857;
International Visual Corp. v. Crown Metal Mfg. Co., 991 F.2d 768 (Fed. Cir. 1993);
Westvaco Corp. v. International Paper Co., 23 USPQ2d 1401 (E.D. Va. 1991) Affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded, 991 F.2d 735 (Fed. Cir. 1993), on remand, 31 USPQ2D 1798 (E.D. Va. 1994).
He is also involved in complex U.S. patent prosecution; U.S. and international patent portfolio management; Hatch-Waxman counseling; freedom to operate studies; IP due diligence investigations, and licensing.